An AI-Driven System for Automated Software Testing and Quality Assurance

Authors

  • Brian K. Jensen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66280/cset.v1i1.91

Keywords:

Automated Software Testing, Quality Assurance, Artificial Intelligence, Systems Architecture, Algorithmic Governance, Infrastructure Sustainability, Socio-Technical Systems.

Abstract

The escalating complexity of modern software ecosystems, characterized by microservices architectures, continuous integration pipelines, and rapid deployment cycles, has rendered traditional manual and script-based quality assurance methodologies increasingly inadequate. This paper presents a comprehensive systems-level analysis of an AI-driven framework for automated software testing and quality assurance, specifically engineered to manage the non-linear dependencies and high-dimensional state spaces of contemporary digital infrastructures. We move beyond localized algorithmic optimizations to explore the broader socio-technical implications of autonomous testing engines. The research scrutinizes the structural trade-offs between the depth of machine learning-based exploratory testing and the operational latency required for real-time developer feedback. We analyze the physicality of testing infrastructures, addressing the integration of heterogeneous execution environments, the necessity of robust data governance in synthetic data generation, and the environmental sustainability of compute-intensive large language models in the testing lifecycle. Furthermore, the discussion examines the policy implications of automated code verification, the ethical imperatives of fairness in algorithmic bug prioritization, and the broader institutional requirements for transparent quality auditing. By synthesizing perspectives from software engineering, artificial intelligence, and institutional governance, this work provides a thorough conceptual roadmap for the next generation of resilient and self-adaptive quality assurance architectures. We conclude that the successful implementation of AI-driven testing is contingent upon a holistic approach that balances technical precision with governance accountability and environmental stewardship, ensuring the long-term viability of the global software supply chain.

References

1.Ahmad, A., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence in software testing: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 9, 131119-131135.

2.Arcuri, A. (2018). AI-driven software engineering and software testing. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Realizing Artificial Intelligence Synergies in Software Engineering.

3.Beizer, B. (1990). Software Testing Techniques. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

4.Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013). Representation learning: A review and new perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(8), 1798-1828.

5.Bertolino, A. (2007). Software testing research: Achievements, challenges, dreams. Future of Software Engineering (FOSE '07).

6.Burnett, M., et al. (2004). End-user software engineering with assertions in the spreadsheet paradigm. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering.

7.Chen, T. Y., et al. (1998). Metamorphic testing: A new approach for generating next test cases. Technical Report, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

8.DeMillo, R. A., Lipton, R. J., & Sayward, F. G. (1978). Hints on test data selection: Help for the practicing programmer. IEEE Computer, 11(4), 34-41.

9.Devlin, J., et al. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.

10.Dijkstra, E. W. (1970). Notes on structured programming. Technological University Eindhoven.

11.Feldt, R., et al. (2018). Autonomous software testing: A vision and roadmap. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Autonomous Software Testing.

12.Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.

13.Harman, M. (2007). The current state and future of search-based software engineering. Future of Software Engineering (FOSE '07).

14.Harman, M., & O'Hearn, P. (2018). From sapienz to sapfix: The machine learning and automated reasoning of software engineering. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Software Engineering.

15.Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735-1780.

16.Kaner, C., Falk, J., & Nguyen, H. Q. (1999). Testing Computer Software. Wiley.

17.LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444.

18.Memon, A. M. (2007). An event-flow model of GUI-based applications for testing. Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 17(3), 137-157.

19.Meszaros, G. (2007). xUnit Test Patterns: Refactoring Test Code. Addison-Wesley.

20.Myers, G. J., Sandler, C., & Badgett, T. (2011). The Art of Software Testing. John Wiley & Sons.

21.Orso, A., & Rothermel, G. (2014). Software testing: A research travelogue (2000–2014). Proceedings of the Future of Software Engineering.

22.Paszke, A., et al. (2019). PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.

23.Pezzè, M., & Young, M. (2008). Software Testing and Analysis: Process, Principles, and Techniques. Wiley.

24.Rossi, G. (2018). Socio-Technical Systems and the Software Industry. Routledge.

25.Schwartz, R., et al. (2020). Green AI. Communications of the ACM, 63(12), 54-63.

26.Tonella, P. (2004). Evolutionary testing of classes. Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis.

27.Vaswani, A., et al. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.

28.Weyuker, E. J. (1982). On testing non-testable programs. The Computer Journal, 25(4), 465-470.

29.Whittaker, J. A. (2000). What is software testing? And why is it so hard? IEEE Software, 17(1), 70-79.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-19

How to Cite

Jensen, B. K. . (2026). An AI-Driven System for Automated Software Testing and Quality Assurance. Computer Science and Engineering Transactions, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.66280/cset.v1i1.91