Developing Incentive Compatible Attribution Engines for Social Advertising using Game Theoretic Autonomous Agents and Distributed Transaction Pipelines
Keywords:
Social Advertising, Incentive Compatibility, Game Theory, Autonomous Agents, Distributed Systems, Multi-Touch Attribution, Socio-Technical Infrastructure.Abstract
The efficacy of social advertising infrastructures is increasingly compromised by the lack of transparent, fair, and incentive-compatible attribution mechanisms. Modern digital advertising relies on complex multi-touch journeys where multiple stakeholders—including influencers, platform algorithms, and third-party affiliates—contribute to a final conversion event. However, existing attribution engines often utilize simplistic heuristics like last-click or first-touch, which fail to capture the true marginal contribution of each participant and encourage adversarial behaviors such as attribution fraud and strategic data withholding. This paper proposes a novel architectural framework for attribution engines that synergizes game-theoretic autonomous agents with distributed transaction pipelines to achieve incentive compatibility. By treating the attribution problem as a cooperative game, we utilize Shapley value-inspired logic to distribute rewards based on the coalitional contribution of every touchpoint in the user journey. The system is implemented through a high-throughput distributed pipeline that ensures transactional integrity and causal consistency across heterogeneous social platforms. We explore the structural trade-offs between computational overhead and attribution precision, emphasizing the necessity of hardware-aware orchestration for real-time incentive calculation. Furthermore, the research addresses critical socio-technical dimensions, including the governance of autonomous agents, the sustainability of large-scale distributed ledgers, and the ethical imperatives of algorithmic fairness in decentralized marketplaces. By aligning individual incentives with systemic efficiency, this framework provides a robust blueprint for a more resilient and transparent social advertising ecosystem that is resistant to manipulation and capable of fostering long-term trust among diverse stakeholders.
References
1.Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 308-318.
2.Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and creates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3-30.
3.Berman, R. (2018). Beyond the last click: Multi-touch attribution in the era of big data. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(4), 450-465.
4.Binmore, K. (2007). Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
5.Bommasani, R., et al. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258.
6.Cartea, A., Jaimungal, S., & Penalva, J. (2015). Algorithmic and High-Frequency Trading. Cambridge University Press.
7.Castro, J., Gómez, D., & Tejada, J. (2009). Polynomial calculation of the Shapley value based on sampling. Computers & Operations Research, 36(5), 1726-1730.
8.Dean, J., & Ghemawat, S. (2008). MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters. Communications of the ACM, 51(1), 107-113.
9.Dwork, C. (2008). Differential privacy: A survey of results. International Conference on Theory and Applications of Models of Computation, 1-19.
10.Edelman, B., Ostrovsky, M., & Schwarz, M. (2007). Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. The American Economic Review, 97(1), 242-259.
11.Ghoshal, B., & Tucker, A. (2022). Scalable inference for deep learning in finance. Quantitative Finance, 22(10), 1845-1860.
12.Gneiting, T., & Raftery, A. E. (2007). Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102(477), 359-378.
13.Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016). Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 29.
14.Kairouz, P., et al. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1-2), 1-210.
15.Kaplan, J., et al. (2020). Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361.
16.Leyton-Brown, K., & Shoham, Y. (2008). Essentials of Game Theory: A Concise, Multidisciplinary Introduction. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
17.Liu, T. (2026). A Comparative Study of Transformer-Based and Classical Models for Financial Time-Series Forecasting. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(3), 203.
18.Lo, A. W. (2017). Adaptive Markets: Financial Evolution at the Speed of Thought. Princeton University Press.
19.Narayanan, A., & Shmatikov, V. (2008). Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets. 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 111-125.
20.Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., & Vazirani, V. V. (2007). Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press.
21.O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown.
22.Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press.
23.Rajbhandari, S., et al. (2020). ZeRO: Memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter models. SC20: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis.
24.Roth, A. E. (2002). The economist as engineer: Game theory, experimentation, and computation as tools for design economics. Econometrica, 70(4), 1341-1378.
25.Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, 2(28), 307-317.
26.Stoica, I., et al. (2017). Ray: A distributed framework for emerging AI applications. 13th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation.
27.Varian, H. R. (2007). Position auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(6), 1163-1178.
28.Vaswani, A., et al. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.
29.Wu, S., et al. (2023). BloombergGPT: A large language model for finance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17564.
30.Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 10(2), 1-19.
31.Yi, X. (2026). Privacy-Enhanced Ad Targeting for Social E-Commerce: A Federated Learning Framework with Zero-Knowledge Verification for Creator Monetization. Frontiers in Business and Finance, 3(1), 102-113.
32.Zaharia, M., et al. (2012). Resilient distributed datasets: A fault-tolerant abstraction for in-memory cluster computing. 9th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation.
33.Zhang, L., et al. (2021). Deep reinforcement learning for automated stock trading: An ensemble strategy. SSRN Electronic Journal.
34.Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.
35.Mo, F., Haddadi, H., Katiyar, K., Ansari, R., & Chuah, C. N. (2021). PPFL: Privacy-preserving federated learning with trusted execution environments. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, 94-108.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Computational Intelligence Systems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
