Physics-Guided Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction with Adaptive Fused Graph Neural Architectures

Authors

  • Jeffrey C. Phillips Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Mateo Thornton Department of Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  • Cody Wolfe Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
  • Tongjing Wan Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.

Keywords:

trajectory prediction, multi-agent systems, graph neural networks, physics-guided machine learning, adaptive fusion, socio-technical infrastructure, robustness, fairness

Abstract

Accurate trajectory prediction for multiple interacting agents is a cornerstone of autonomous systems, ranging from self-driving vehicles to drone swarms and pedestrian tracking. While graph neural architectures have advanced the modeling of spatiotemporal dependencies among agents, they often produce predictions that violate fundamental physical laws, such as momentum conservation or collision avoidance. This paper proposes a physics-guided multi-agent trajectory prediction framework that integrates adaptive fused graph neural architectures with explicit physical constraints. The system architecture comprises a spatiotemporal graph encoder that captures agent interactions, a physics-guided module that enforces Newtonian dynamics and geometric consistency, and an adaptive fusion mechanism that dynamically balances data-driven and physics-based predictions based on contextual cues. The paper emphasizes system-level considerations, including structural trade-offs between physical fidelity and model flexibility, computational efficiency, and robustness to noisy observations. It further examines governance challenges related to certification and interpretability, fairness implications arising from biased training data or physics priors, and sustainability concerns in deployment across resource-constrained platforms. Through cross-domain case illustrations involving autonomous driving, pedestrian crowds, and aerial swarms, the study highlights how adaptive fusion can improve prediction reliability while maintaining generalizability. The work concludes with a forward-looking perspective on integrating uncertainty quantification, lifelong learning, and policy frameworks to ensure safe and equitable deployment of physics-guided trajectory prediction systems.

References

1. Alahi, A., Goel, K., Ramanathan, V., Robicquet, A., Fei-Fei, L., & Savarese, S. (2016). Social LSTM: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 961–971). IEEE.

2. Vemula, A., Muelling, K., & Oh, J. (2018). Social attention: Modeling attention in human crowds. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 4601–4607). IEEE.

3. Gupta, A., Johnson, J., Fei-Fei, L., Savarese, S., & Alahi, A. (2018). Social GAN: Socially acceptable trajectories with generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 2255–2264). IEEE.

4. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707.

5. Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2017). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.

6. Zhu, P., Han, F., & Deng, H. (2023, December). Flexible multi-generator model with fused spatiotemporal graph for trajectory prediction. In IET Conference Proceedings CP874 (Vol. 2023, No. 47, pp. 417-422). Stevenage, UK: The Institution of Engineering and Technology.

7. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 30, pp. 5998–6008).

8. Schölkopf, B., Locatello, F., S., L. (2021). Towards causal representation learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(5), 612–634.

9. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.

10. Jacobs, R. A., Jordan, M. I., Nowlan, S. J., & Hinton, G. E. (1991). Adaptive mixtures of local experts. Neural Computation, 3(1), 79–87.

11. Lerner, A., Chrysanthou, Y., & Lischinski, D. (2007). Crowds by example. Computer Graphics Forum, 26(3), 655–664.

12. Gilmer, J., Schoenholz, S. S., Riley, P. F., Vinyals, O., & Dahl, G. E. (2017). Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 1263–1272). PMLR.

13. Helbing, D., & Molnar, P. (1995). Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review E, 51(5), 4282–4286.

14. Lu, L., Jin, P., Pang, G., Zhang, Z., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2021). Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(3), 218–229.

15. Salakhutdinov, R., & Hinton, G. (2009). Deep Boltzmann machines. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 448–455). PMLR.

16. Madry, A., Makelov, A., Schmidt, L., Tsipras, D., & Vladu, A. (2018). Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.

17. Cheng, Y., Wang, D., Zhou, P., & Zhang, T. (2017). A survey of model compression and acceleration for deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.09282.

18. Choromanski, K., Likhosherstov, V., Dohan, D., Song, X., Gane, A., Sarlos, T., ... & Weller, A. (2021). Rethinking attention with performers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.

19. Schlichtkrull, M., Kipf, T. N., Bloem, P., van den Berg, R., Titov, I., & Welling, M. (2018). Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the European Semantic Web Conference (pp. 593–607). Springer.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-09

How to Cite

Jeffrey C. Phillips, Mateo Thornton, Cody Wolfe, & Tongjing Wan. (2026). Physics-Guided Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction with Adaptive Fused Graph Neural Architectures. Computational Intelligence Systems, 4(1). Retrieved from https://scivexus.org/index.php/CIS/article/view/360