NeuroSymbolic Clinical Decision Agents with Fast Reactive Policies and Slow Diagnostic Reasoning
Keywords:
neurosymbolic AI, clinical decision support, dual-process reasoning, reactive policies, diagnostic reasoning, healthcare infrastructure, fairness, robustnessAbstract
The integration of artificial intelligence into clinical decision-making has historically oscillated between purely data-driven deep learning approaches and rule-based symbolic reasoning. Each paradigm offers distinct advantages: neural networks excel at pattern recognition from raw patient data, while symbolic systems provide transparent, logical inference. This paper proposes a hybrid neurosymbolic architecture for clinical decision agents that explicitly separates fast, reactive policies from slow, deliberative diagnostic reasoning, inspired by dual-process cognitive theories. The fast component learns low-latency, high-frequency responses for routine or time-critical tasks such as triage alerts, medication dosing adjustments, and flagging abnormal vital signs. The slow component engages in structured, multi-step diagnostic reasoning using knowledge graphs, patient history, and clinical guidelines to generate explainable differential diagnoses and treatment plans. We examine the structural trade-offs between these two modes, including latency versus accuracy, transparency versus performance, and adaptability versus stability. The paper further explores system-level considerations for deployment in hospital infrastructures, including governance frameworks, data privacy, regulatory compliance, and the need for continuous validation across diverse populations. Challenges of robustness against distributional shifts, fairness across demographic groups, and long-term sustainability of such hybrid systems are analyzed through case illustrations from emergency medicine, chronic disease management, and telemedicine. We conclude with forward-looking perspectives on how neurosymbolic clinical agents can be designed to augment rather than replace human clinicians, ensuring that fast and slow reasoning complement each other within a human-in-the-loop framework. The proposed architecture offers a path toward accountable, adaptable, and trustworthy AI in healthcare.
References
1. Shortliffe, E. H., & Buchanan, B. G. (1975). A model of inexact reasoning in medicine. Mathematical Biosciences, 23(3-4), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(75)90047-4
2. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
3. Garcez, A. d., & Lamb, L. C. (2023). Neurosymbolic AI: The 3rd wave. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(2), 1235–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10247-5
4. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
5. Dou, Z., Cui, D., Yan, J., Wang, W., Chen, B., Wang, H., ... & Zhang, S. (2025). Dsadf: Thinking fast and slow for decision making. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.08189.
6. Bates, D. W., & Gawande, A. A. (2003). Improving safety with information technology. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(25), 2526–2534. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa020847
7. Rajpurkar, P., Chen, E., Banerjee, O., & Topol, E. J. (2022). AI in health and medicine. Nature Medicine, 28(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01614-0
8. Tjoa, E., & Guan, C. (2020). A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Toward medical XAI. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32(11), 4793–4813. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3027314
9. Marcus, G., & Davis, E. (2019). Rebooting AI: Building artificial intelligence we can trust. Pantheon Books.
10. Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., ... & Hassabis, D. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16961
11. Holzinger, A., Langs, G., Denk, H., Zatloukal, K., & Müller, H. (2019). Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 9(4), e1312. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1312
12. Obermeyer, Z., & Emanuel, E. J. (2016). Predicting the future—Big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(13), 1216–1219. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1606181
13. Liu, Y., Chen, P. H. C., Krause, J., & Peng, L. (2019). How to read articles that use machine learning: Users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA, 322(18), 1806–1816. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.16489
14. Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.
15. Raji, I. D., & Buolamwini, J. (2019). Actionable auditing: Investigating the impact of publicly naming biased performance results of commercial AI products. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 429–435). https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314244
16. Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D. (2018). Implementing machine learning in health care—Addressing ethical challenges. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(11), 981–983. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1714229
17. Sendak, M. P., Ratliff, W., Sarro, D., Alderton, E., O'Brien, C., O'Connell, J., ... & Fiebig, D. (2020). Real-world integration of a sepsis deep learning technology into routine clinical care: An implementation science approach. JAMA Network Open, 3(4), e203184. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3184
18. Ghassemi, M., Naumann, T., Schulam, P., Beam, A. L., Chen, I. Y., & Ranganath, R. (2020). Practical guidance on artificial intelligence for health-care data. The Lancet Digital Health, 2(11), e580–e586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30222-9
19. Yu, K. H., Beam, A. L., & Kohane, I. S. (2018). Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 2(10), 719–731. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z
20. Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016). Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Computational Intelligence Systems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
