Streamlining Real Time Decision Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning Driven Large Language Model Agents for Complex Task Planning and Adaptation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66280/cis.v1i1.198Abstract
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into autonomous decision-making frameworks has catalyzed a shift in how socio-technical systems manage complex task planning. However, the inherent latency and stochastic nature of autoregressive generation often impede real-time responsiveness in dynamic environments. This research paper explores the architectural convergence of Reinforcement Learning (RL) and LLM-based agents to streamline decision reasoning. By shifting the paradigm from static prompting to dynamic, policy-driven adaptation, we investigate how reinforcement learning can refine the internal latent reasoning paths of agents to prioritize efficiency and robustness. The study emphasizes system-level trade-offs, particularly the tension between computational intensity and decision fidelity. We examine the infrastructure required to deploy these agents at scale, focusing on the governance of autonomous reasoning and the ethical implications of RL-tuned linguistic agents. Through an analysis of deployment strategies and sustainability, the paper argues that a decentralized, RL-augmented framework significantly enhances the reliability of automated systems in high-stakes environments. The discussion extends to policy implications, suggesting that as these agents become embedded in critical infrastructure, new regulatory standards for algorithmic transparency and fairness are essential to mitigate systemic risks.
References
1.Abbeel, P., & Ng, A. Y. (2004). Apprenticeship learning via inverse reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning.
2.Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016). Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565.
3.Bengio, Y., Lecun, Y., & Hinton, G. (2021). Deep learning for AI. Communications of the ACM, 64(7), 58-65.
4.Bhardwaj, A., & Kumar, S. (2023). Distributed architectures for real-time AI agents. Journal of Systems and Software, 195, 111524.
5.Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33, 1877-1901.
6.Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). What can AI do? Determining the potentially-intended impacts of machine learning. Science, 358(6370), 1530-1534.
7.Chen, M., Tworek, J., Jun, H., Yuan, Q., Pinto, H. P. d. O., Kaplan, J., ... & Zaremba, W. (2021). Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374.
8.Cummings, M. L. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Autonomous Weapons. Chatham House Report.
9.Dhariwal, P., & Nichol, A. (2021). Diffusion models beat GANs on image synthesis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, 8780-8794.
10.Dietterich, T. G. (2017). Steps toward robust artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 38(3), 3-24.
11.Dobbe, R., Dean, S., Gilbert, T., & Kohli, N. (2021). A multi-stakeholder framework for ethical AI in local government. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 167, 105377.
12.Dou, Z., Zhao, Q., Wan, Z., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Raiyan, T., ... & Biswas, S. (2025). Plan Then Action: High-Level Planning Guidance Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01833.
13.Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1).
14.Gunning, D., & Aha, D. (2019). DARPA’s Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Program. AI Magazine, 40(2), 44-58.
15.Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5-14.
16.Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399.
17.Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361.
18.Kasirzadeh, A., & Gabriel, I. (2023). In conversation with AI: Aligning language models with human values. Philosophy & Technology, 36(2), 27.
19.Korinek, A. (2023). Generative AI for economic research: Use cases and implications for economists. Journal of Economic Literature.
20.Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., ... & Hassabis, D. (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540), 529-533.
21.O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Broadway Books.
22.Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017). Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347.
23.Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., Van Den Driessche, G., ... & Hassabis, D. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587), 484-489.
24.Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
25.Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. MIT Press.
26.Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Knopf.
27.Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
28.Wang, J. X., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Tirumala, S., Alden, H., Chen, S., Costa, L., ... & Botvinick, M. (2018). Learning to reinforcement learn. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.08296.
29.Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Fei-Fei, L., Chi, E., ... & Zhou, D. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 24824-24837.
30.Whittaker, M., Crawford, K., Dobbe, R., Fried, G., Kaziunas, E., Mathur, V., ... & Schwartz, O. (2018). AI Now Report 2018. AI Now Institute at New York University.
31.Wu, C. J., Raghavendra, R., Gupta, U., Bilir, I., Cho, Y., Azad, S., ... & Hazelwood, K. (2022). Sustainable AI: Environmental implications, challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, 4, 795-813.
32.Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2023). React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.03629.
33.Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Computational Intelligence Systems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
